You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Writing scientific manuscripts: most common mistakes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.113-117.sar |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jorge Faber |
Abstract |
I have had the privilege of serving as editor-in-chief for 11 years of two scientific journals: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics and the Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. I had the opportunity to read and correct thousands of manuscripts. This experience was greatly enriching, because reading a text professionally completely differs from the perspective of readers in general. The routine practice of correcting manuscripts has made me realize that some errors recur frequently. To help authors to improve their manuscripts before submission, these problems are discussed here in the order that they appear in conventional manuscript sections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 13 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 31 | 29% |
Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Linguistics | 9 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 30% |
Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,609,898
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#26
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,760
of 331,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.