↓ Skip to main content

The T-loop in details

Overview of attention for article published in Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The T-loop in details
Published in
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, January 2018
DOI 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.108-117.sar
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Frizzo Viecilli, Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Professor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 57%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#65
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,135
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.