↓ Skip to main content

Force decay evaluation of latex and non-latex orthodontic intraoral elastics: in vivo study

Overview of attention for article published in Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Force decay evaluation of latex and non-latex orthodontic intraoral elastics: in vivo study
Published in
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, December 2018
DOI 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.042-047.oar
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Ferreira de Carvalho Notaroberto, Mariana Martins e Martins, Maria Teresa de Andrade Goldner, Alvaro de Moraes Mendes, Cátia Cardoso Abdo Quintão

Abstract

This clinical study was conducted in order to evaluate force decay over time of latex and non-latex orthodontic intraoral elastics. Patients (n = 15) were evaluated using latex and non-latex elastics in the periods of : 0, 1, 3, 12 and 24 hours. The rubber bands were transferred to the testing machine (EMIC DL-500 MF), and force values were recorded after stretching the elastic to a length of 25mm. Paired t test was applied and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the variation of force generated. LSD (Fisher's least significant difference) post-hoc test was thus employed. As regards the initial forces (zero time), the values of force for non-latex elastic were slightly higher than for the latex elastic. In the subsequent times, the forces generated by the latex elastic showed higher values. Regarding the material degradation, at the end of 24 hours the highest percentage was observed for non-latex elastic. The latex elastics had a more stable behavior during the studied period, compared with non-latex.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Postgraduate 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 48%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 32%