↓ Skip to main content

Insight in bipolar disorder: a comparison between mania, depression and euthymia using the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insight in bipolar disorder: a comparison between mania, depression and euthymia using the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders
Published in
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, September 2015
DOI 10.1590/2237-6089-2015-0014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael de Assis da Silva, Daniel C. Mograbi, Evelyn V. M. Camelo, Jaqueline Bifano, Mayra Wainstok, Luciana Angélica Silva Silveira, Elie Cheniaux

Abstract

To evaluate whether having general insight into bipolar disorder and its symptoms is affected by the mood state of the patient, using the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders, a hetero-application scale for people with mood disorders. Ninety-five patients with bipolar disorder were evaluated and divided into different groups according to the mood state presented during assessment (i.e., euthymia, mania and depression). Sociodemographic and clinical data (Hamilton Depression Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions Scale) were recorded. Insight was evaluated using the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders. Patients with bipolar disorder in mania show less insight about their condition than patients in depression or euthymia, and less insight about their symptoms than patients with depression, with the exception of awareness of weight change. Loss of insight during mania may have important implications for treatment compliance and adherence and needs to be taken into account in the clinical management of people with bipolar disorder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%