↓ Skip to main content

Frequency Modulation System and speech perception in the classroom: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frequency Modulation System and speech perception in the classroom: a systematic literature review
Published in
CoDAS, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Lívia Libardi Bertachini, Altair Cadrobbi Pupo, Marina Morettin, Maria Angelina Nardi Martinez, Maria Cecília Bevilacqua, Adriane Lima Mortari Moret, Sheila Andreoli Balen, Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob

Abstract

This review aimed at presenting the benefits regarding the speech perception in noise shown by children who wear hearing aid devices and/or cochlear implants with the Frequency Modulation (FM) System at school. A bibliographic survey was conducted in an electronic database with standardized search until the year 2012, and a manual search was performed by using specific keywords. For the selection and evaluation of the scientific studies chosen in the search, criteria were established covering the following aspects: type of study, participants, adopted intervention, and evaluation of results. The FM system was verified to improve speech perception and speech threshold in noise in all studies. Regarding the performance as to type, the best results were obtained when children used the personal FM system, followed by the table and the sound field systems. After extensive review of national and international literature, it was concluded that the studies indicate the need for further research concerning mainly the impact of the FM system on the school performance of children who have sensory devices coupled to the FM system. Findings in the literature with relation to the publications focused on speech perception in noise did not relate educational and auditory aspects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Linguistics 6 7%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 28 32%