↓ Skip to main content

Instrumentos para avaliação de apraxia de fala infantil

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Instrumentos para avaliação de apraxia de fala infantil
Published in
CoDAS, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marileda Barichello Gubiani, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin, Marcia Keske-Soares

Abstract

This study systematically reviews the literature on the main tools used to evaluate childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Research strategy: The search strategy includes Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases. Empirical studies that used tools for assessing CAS were selected. Articles were selected by two independent researchers. The search retrieved 695 articles, out of which 12 were included in the study. Five tools were identified: Verbal Motor Production Assessment for Children, Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill, The Orofacial Praxis Test, Kaufman Speech Praxis Test for Children, and Madison Speech Assessment Protocol. There are few instruments available for CAS assessment and most of them are intended to assess praxis and/or orofacial movements, sequences of orofacial movements, articulation of syllables and phonemes, spontaneous speech, and prosody. There are some tests for assessment and diagnosis of CAS. However, few studies on this topic have been conducted at the national level, as well as protocols to assess and assist in an accurate diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Psychology 8 8%
Linguistics 4 4%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 42 40%