↓ Skip to main content

Fonoaudiologia e nutrição em ambiente hospitalar: análise de terminologia de classificação das consistências alimentares

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fonoaudiologia e nutrição em ambiente hospitalar: análise de terminologia de classificação das consistências alimentares
Published in
CoDAS, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20152015059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Cláudia Fernandes Amaral, Lívia Azevedo Rodrigues, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan, Laélia Cristina Caseiro Vicente, Andréa Rodrigues Motta

Abstract

Purpose To verify if there is an agreement between speech-language pathologists and nutritionists about the classification of food textures used in hospitals and their opinions about the possible consequences of differences in this classification. Methods This is a descriptive, cross-sectional study with 30 speech-language pathologists and 30 nutritionists who worked in 14 hospitals of public and/or private network in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. The professionals answered a questionnaire, prepared by the researchers, and classified five different foods, with and without theoretical direction. The data were analyzed using Fisher's exact and Z -tests to compare ratios with a 5% significance level. Results Both speech-language therapists (100%) and nutritionists (90%) perceive divergence in the classification and, 86.2% and 100% of them, respectively, believe that this difference may affect the patients' recovery. Aspiration risk was the most mentioned problem. For the general classification of food textures, most of the professionals (88.5%) suggested four to six terms. As to the terminology used in the classification of food presented without theoretical direction, the professionals cited 49 terms and agreed only in the solid and liquid classifications. With theoretical direction, the professionals also agreed in the classification of thick and thin paste. Conclusion Both the professionals recognized divergences in the classification of food textures and the consequent risk of damage to patient's recovery. The use of theoretical direction increased the agreement between these professionals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 53%