↓ Skip to main content

O desenvolvimento da linguagem da criança após o implante coclear: uma revisão de literatura

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
O desenvolvimento da linguagem da criança após o implante coclear: uma revisão de literatura
Published in
CoDAS, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clarice Gomes Monteiro, Ana Augusta de Andrade Cordeiro, Hilton Justino da Silva, Bianca Arruda Manchester de Queiroga

Abstract

review the literature for studies that describe the language development of children after they receive cochlear implants. Literature review on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct databases, tracing the selection and critical analysis stages in the journals found and selected. We selected original articles looking at children with cochlear implants, which mentioned language development after surgery. Case studies, dissertations, books chapters, editorials, and original articles that did not mention aspects of oral communication development, perception of sounds and speech, and other stages of human development, in the title, abstract, or text, were excluded. A protocol was created for this study including the following points: author, year, location, sample, type of study, objectives, methods used, main results, and conclusion. 5,052 articles were found based on the search descriptors and free terms. Of this total, 3,414 were excluded due to the title, 1,245 due to the abstract, and 358 from reading the full text; we selected 35, of which 28 were repeated. In the end, seven articles were analyzed in this review. We conclude that cochlear implant users have slower linguistic and educational development than their peers with normal hearing - though they are better than conventional prostheses users - and they are able to match them over time. There is great variability in the test methodologies, thus reducing the effectiveness and reliability of the results found.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 26 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 18%
Unspecified 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Psychology 5 7%
Linguistics 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 27 37%