Title |
Reduzindo o gap entre a ciência e a clínica: lições da academia e da prática profissional – parte B: técnicas tradicionais de terapia vocal e técnicas modernas de eletroestimulação e fotobiomodulação aplicadas à reabilitação vocal
|
---|---|
Published in |
CoDAS, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021241pt |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mara Behlau, Anna Alice Almeida, Geová Amorim, Patrícia Balata, Sávio Bastos, Mauriceia Cassol, Ana Carolina Constantini, Claudia Eckley, Marina Englert, Ana Cristina Cortes Gama, Ingrid Gielow, Bruno Guimarães, Livia Ribeiro Lima, Leonardo Lopes, Glaucya Madazio, Felipe Moreti, Vanessa Mouffron, Katia Nemr, Priscila Oliveira, Marina Padovani, Vanessa Veis Ribeiro, Kelly Silverio, Thays Vaiano, Rosiane Yamasaki |
Abstract |
This text is the continuation of the XVIII SBFa Congress publication. In part "A" we presented the analyses on clinical vocal evaluation. Part "B" focuses on vocal rehabilitation: 4. Traditional techniques of vocal therapy; 5. Modern techniques of electrostimulation and photobiomodulation applied to vocal rehabilitation. The numerous studies on the various programs, methods, and techniques of traditional rehabilitation techniques, and many with high quality of evidence, allow us to consider such procedures relatively well described, safe, and with known effects, accounting for the treatment of various vocal disorders. The scientific evidence with traditional techniques is recognized worldwide. New fronts of evolution, with electrostimulation or photobiomodulation used to handle voice problems, seem to be promising as coadjutant approaches. There are more studies on electrostimulation in vocal rehabilitation than with photobiomodulation; however, scientific evidence for these two modern techniques is still limited. Knowledge and caution are required for the application of either technique. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |