You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shale gas plays, Neuquén Basin, Argentina: chemostratigraphy and mud gas carbon isotopes insights
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Geology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-4889201620150001 |
| Authors |
Héctor Adolfo Ostera, Roberto García, Daniel Malizia, Pablo Kokot, Leonel Wainstein, Marcelo Ricciutti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 67% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Geology
#9
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,810
of 353,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Geology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.