You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Paleomagnetism of the Amazonian Craton and its role in paleocontinents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Geology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-4889201620160055 |
| Authors |
Manoel Souza D'Agrella-Filho, Franklin Bispo-Santos, Ricardo Ivan Ferreira Trindade, Paul Yves Jean Antonio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 59% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Geology
#8
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,050
of 353,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Geology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them