↓ Skip to main content

Teorias da linguística cognitiva para pensar a categorização no âmbito da Ciência da Informação

Overview of attention for article published in Transinformação, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teorias da linguística cognitiva para pensar a categorização no âmbito da Ciência da Informação
Published in
Transinformação, April 2018
DOI 10.1590/2318-08892018000100007
Authors

Luciana Monteiro KREBS, Rita do Carmo Ferreira LAIPELT

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 23%
Social Sciences 3 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Linguistics 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Transinformação
#54
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,115
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transinformação
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them