You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correction equations to estimate body fat with plicometer WCS dual hand
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research on Biomedical Engineering, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1590/2446-4740.01117 |
Authors |
Hiago Augusto Zonatto, Marcelo Romanovitch Ribas, Eduardo Bolicenha Simm, André Gonçalves de Oliveira, Julio Cesar Bassan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Research on Biomedical Engineering
#11
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,576
of 336,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Biomedical Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them