↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes mellitus and spinal epidural abscess: clinical or surgical treatment?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diabetes mellitus and spinal epidural abscess: clinical or surgical treatment?
Published in
Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, January 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0004-27302011000900009
Pubmed ID
Authors

João S. Felício, Carlliane Lins P. Martins, Bernardo Liberman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#304
of 800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,281
of 249,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.