↓ Skip to main content

Algoritmos de diagnóstico da Rome Foundation: prefácio à edição do suplemento da Rome Foundation Diagnosis Algorithms for Common Gastrointestinal Symptoms publicado pelo American Journal of…

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Algoritmos de diagnóstico da Rome Foundation: prefácio à edição do suplemento da Rome Foundation Diagnosis Algorithms for Common Gastrointestinal Symptoms publicado pelo American Journal of Gastroenterology em 2010
Published in
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, January 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0004-28032012000500003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas A Drossman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#223
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,674
of 288,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.