You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY AND SURGERY COMPARED WITH SURGERY ALONE IN SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0004-28032013000200016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nelson Adami ANDREOLLO, Valdir TERCIOTI, Luiz Roberto LOPES, João de Souza COELHO-NETO |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,926,903
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#38
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,703
of 200,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.