↓ Skip to main content

The value of csf analysis for the differential diagnosis of HTLV-I associated myelopathy and multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The value of csf analysis for the differential diagnosis of HTLV-I associated myelopathy and multiple sclerosis
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, December 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x1995000500008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marzia Puccioni-Sohler, Bernd Kitze, Klaus Felgenhauer, Iris T. Graef, Peter Lange, Sergio Novis, Hansotto Reiber, Beatriz Vaz

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum of 17 patients with HAM/TSP (HTLV-I associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis), six with multiple sclerosis and six with idiopathic epilepsy (non inflammatory control) from Brazil were analysed for the presence of intrathecal synthesis of virus-specific antibodies against measles, rubella, varicella zoster virus and herpes simplex virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). All HAM/TSP and multiple sclerosis cases had an intrathecal immune response (oligoclonal IgG). In HAM/TSP, only 1/17 case showed a polyspecific intrathecal immune response against measles and rubella virus. In multiple sclerosis, specific antibodies against measles and rubella (MRZ response) were observed in all patients but not in the control with idiopathic epilepsy. The diagnostic and theoretical relevance of mono- and polyspecific immune responses is discussed for these chronic neurological diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 5 26%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Neuroscience 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%