↓ Skip to main content

Carbon dioxide induced panic attacks and short term clonazepam treatment: preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon dioxide induced panic attacks and short term clonazepam treatment: preliminary study
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, December 2000
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x1999000300003
Pubmed ID
Authors

ANTONIO EGIDIO NARDI, ALEXANDRE M. VALENÇA, WALTER ZIN, ISABELLA NASCIMENTO

Abstract

1. To verify the sensibility of panic patients to a mixture of 35% CO2 and 65% O2. 2. To determine if a ten days treatment with clonazepam attenuates the panic attacks induced by the inhalation of 35% carbon dioxide in panic disorder. We randomly selected six panic disorder subjects, using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. All subjects went double-blindly through an inhalation of 35% CO2 and compressed gas (atmospheric air) on two occasions. First, at baseline, when they were drug free. Second, after a 10 days clonazepam treatment. Neither at baseline nor after treatment any patient had a panic attack during compressed gas inhalation. At the first test five patients (83.3%) had a severe panic attack with high levels of subjective anxiety during carbon dioxide inhalation. After 9.6 (+/- 3.4) days of clonazepam treatment, only two (33.3%) patients experienced a mild panic attack. This pilot study suggests the efficacy of the short term clonazepam therapy in attenuating panic attacks and supports the usefulness of the 35% carbon dioxide challenge test as an analogue method for study the efficacy of anti-panic drugs. Further placebo-controlled studies to pharmacological treatment are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 22%
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Unspecified 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#1,140
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,719
of 114,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#40
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.