↓ Skip to main content

Multiple sclerosis in Brazil: analysis of cerebrospinal fluid by standard methods

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple sclerosis in Brazil: analysis of cerebrospinal fluid by standard methods
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, April 2000
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x1999000600005
Pubmed ID
Authors

MARZIA PUCCIONI-SOHLER, FABIOLA PASSER, CRISTIANE OLIVEIRA, CARLOS OTÁVIO BRANDÃO, REGINA PAPAIZ-ALVARENGA

Abstract

The demonstration of intrathecal IgG synthesis has been used as an important laboratory parameter to support the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). The Committee for European Concerted Action for Multiple Sclerosis has recommended a protocol for the assessment of intrathecal IgG synthesis. We applied this methodology to determine the cerebrospinal (CSF) profile of 128 Brazilian patients with MS. We detected hypercytosis lower than 35 cells/mm3 in 97%, protein lower than 80 mg/dl in 99%, normal blood-CSF barrier function in 76%, increased IgG local production around 53% and oligoclonal IgG bands by isoelectric focusing in 85% of the definite MS patients. The diagnostic accuracy of the quantitative analysis was lower than the qualitative. The detection of oligoclonal bands was especially important in the cases of normal quantitative assays of IgG. In addition, we found a lower frequency of inflammatory reaction in CSF in our MS cases, in comparison to some European studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Other 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Neuroscience 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%