↓ Skip to main content

Neurocitoma central com apresentação incomum por hemorragia intraventricular: relato de caso

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurocitoma central com apresentação incomum por hemorragia intraventricular: relato de caso
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2001
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2001000400030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Alexandre Hanel, Juan Carlos Montaño, Emerson Gasparetto, Léo F. da Silva Ditzel, Luis Fernado Bleggi Torres, João Cândido Araujo

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#359
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,010
of 44,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.