↓ Skip to main content

Consenso expandido do BCTRIMS para o tratamento da esclerose múltipla: III. Diretrizes baseadas em evidências e recomendações

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consenso expandido do BCTRIMS para o tratamento da esclerose múltipla: III. Diretrizes baseadas em evidências e recomendações
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2002
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2002000500037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Aurélio Lana-Peixoto, Dagoberto Callegaro, Marcos Aurélio Moreira, Gilberto Belisário Campos, Paulo Eurípedes Marchiori, Alberto Alain Gabbai, Luiz Alberto Bacheschi, Walter Oleschko Arruda, Paulo Diniz Gama, Aílton Souza Melo, Fernando Coronetti Gomes Rocha, Angelina Maria Martins Lino, Maria Lúcia Brito Ferreira, Luiz Ataide

Abstract

There has been unprecedented advances in knowledge of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the last few years. A new set of criteria for its diagnosis and a bunch of recent clinical trials with disease-modifying agents (DMA) have been published. All of that has made it necessary to update and expand the previous consensus for MS treatment as formulated by the Brazilian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (BCTRIMS) two years ago. The BCTRIMS Expanded Consensus emphasizes the need to (1) consider MS treatment on an individual basis; (2) educate patients about the potential benefits and risks of treatment; (3) monitor drugs side effects; (4) have a signed Informed Consent Form; (5) consider the relative cost of the drug. The various clinical possibilities and the indications of the DMA and other immunointerventions are considered according to classes of evidences and types of recommendations. The BCTRIMS Expanded Consensus on Treatment of MS may turn out to be a model to other developing countries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 33%
Lecturer 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 17%
Neuroscience 2 17%
Psychology 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%