↓ Skip to main content

Coma scales: a historical review

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coma scales: a historical review
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2010000600019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Luisa Bordini, Thiago F. Luiz, Maurício Fernandes, Walter O. Arruda, Hélio A.G. Teive

Abstract

To describe the most important coma scales developed in the last fifty years.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 47%
Neuroscience 14 12%
Psychology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#387
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,081
of 190,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.