↓ Skip to main content

Depression in Parkinson's disease: diagnosis and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depression in Parkinson's disease: diagnosis and treatment
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, August 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2012000800011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavio Henrique de Rezende Costa, Ana Lucia Zuma Rosso, Henryk Maultasch, Denise Hack Nicaretta, Maurice Borges Vincent

Abstract

The prevalence of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) is high. Depression varies from 20 to 50% of the PD patients, and is associated with increasing disability. The key characteristics of depression are anhedonia and low mood. The recommended scales for screening purposes are: HAM-D, BDI, HADS, MADRS and GDS. As for measurement of severity: HAM-D, MADRS, BDI and SDS. In cases with mild depression, non-pharmacological intervention is the treatment of choice. In moderate depression, antidepressants are required. The choice of an antidepressant should be based mainly on the comorbidities and unique features of the patient. Evidence for antidepressant effectiveness is seen mostly with amitriptyline and nortriptyline, but one should be cautious in elderly patients. Other antidepressants that can be prescribed are: citalopram, escitalopram, sertraline, bupropion, trazodone, venlafaxine, mirtazapine and duloxetin. The dopaminergic agonist pramipexole is a treatment option.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Psychology 9 7%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#955
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,734
of 186,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.