↓ Skip to main content

Paths to congress: candidates running for and elected to the Brazilian chamber of deputies in 2006

Overview of attention for article published in Dados, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paths to congress: candidates running for and elected to the Brazilian chamber of deputies in 2006
Published in
Dados, December 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0011-52582009000200002
Authors

Renato Monseff Perissinotto, Angel Miríade

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 70%
Computer Science 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Dados
#402
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,541
of 176,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dados
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.