↓ Skip to main content

FAO, hunger, and rural women

Overview of attention for article published in Dados, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FAO, hunger, and rural women
Published in
Dados, July 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0011-52582013000200002
Authors

Maria Ignez S. Paulilo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 6%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Dados
#149
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,542
of 206,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dados
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.