↓ Skip to main content

Medicina popular: benefícios e malefícios das plantas medicinais

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medicina popular: benefícios e malefícios das plantas medicinais
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, May 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0034-71672008000200009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inácia Sátiro Xavier de França, Jeová Alves de Souza, Rosilene Santos Baptista, Virgínia Rossana de Sousa Britto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2019.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#560
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,974
of 87,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.