↓ Skip to main content

Reticulação do colágeno corneano com radiação ultravioleta e riboflavina para tratamento do ceratocone: resultados preliminares de um estudo brasileiro

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reticulação do colágeno corneano com radiação ultravioleta e riboflavina para tratamento do ceratocone: resultados preliminares de um estudo brasileiro
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia, October 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0034-72802008000500006
Authors

Ricardo Lamy, Camila Fonseca Netto, Mariana Gomes Pecego, José Guilherme de Carvalho Pecego, Basílio de Bragança Pereira, Haroldo Vieira de Moraes, Adalmir Morterá Dantas

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2011.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
#4
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,051
of 101,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them