↓ Skip to main content

Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus: cost-effectiveness analysis for renal transplantation in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Saúde Pública, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus: cost-effectiveness analysis for renal transplantation in Brazil
Published in
Revista de Saúde Pública, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005430
Pubmed ID
Authors

Augusto Afonso Guerra, Grazielle Dias Silva, Eli Iola Gurgel Andrade, Mariângela Leal Cherchiglia, Juliana de Oliveira Costa, Alessandra Maciel Almeida, Francisco de Assis Acurcio

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#869
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,583
of 270,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.