You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Agricultural development and arthropod-borne diseases: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista de Saúde Pública, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-89101991000300002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.W. Service |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#160
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,257
of 75,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.