↓ Skip to main content

Influenza vaccination in Brazil: rationale and caveats

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de Saúde Pública, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influenza vaccination in Brazil: rationale and caveats
Published in
Revista de Saúde Pública, January 2005
DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102005000100017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sérgio Souza da Cunha, Luiz Antonio B Camacho, Andréia Costa Santos, Inês Dourado

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#278
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,565
of 153,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.