You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista de Saúde Pública, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-89102006000400004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laragh Gollogly, Hooman Momen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,875,065
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#205
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,062
of 168,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.