↓ Skip to main content

Antibacterial effect (in vitro) of Moringa oleifera and Annona muricata against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
16 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibacterial effect (in vitro) of Moringa oleifera and Annona muricata against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria
Published in
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, June 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0036-46652010000300003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Hitzschky Fernandes Viera, Jozeanne Alves Mourão, Ângela Maria Ângelo, Renata Albuquerque Costa, Regine Helena Silva dos Fernandes Vieira

Abstract

Antibacterial effects of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of seeds of moringa (Moringa oleifera) and pods of soursop (Annona muricata) in the concentration of 1:5 and 1:10 in volumes 50, 100, 150 and 200 microL were examined against Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholerae, Escherichia coli (isolated from the organism and the aquatic environment) and Salmonella Enteritidis. Antibacterial activity (inhibition halo > 13 mm) against S. aureus, V. cholerae and E. coli isolated from the whiteleg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannmaei, was detected in aqueous and ethanolic extracts of moringa. E. coli isolated from tilapiafish, Oreochromis niloticus, was sensitive to the ethanolic extract of moringa. The aqueous extracts of soursop showed an antibacterial effect against S. aureus and V. cholerae, but the antibacterial activity by the ethanol extracts of this plant was not demonstrated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Jordan 1 <1%
Unknown 360 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 22%
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Researcher 23 6%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 91 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 7%
Chemistry 24 7%
Other 71 19%
Unknown 103 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,055,117
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#89
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,834
of 104,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.