You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avaliação clínica do quinino para o tratamento de malária por Plasmodium falciparum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0037-86821997000300007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcos Boulos, Araripe Pacheco Dutra, Silvia Maria DiSanti, Mário Shiroma, Vicente Amato Neto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 19 | 53% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,102,924
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#11
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#583
of 40,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.