You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lessons from the epidemiological surveillance program, during the influenza A (H1N1) virus epidemic, in a reference university hospital of Southeastern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0037-86822011005000048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Luiza Moretti, Verônica Sinkoc, Luis Gustavo de Oliveira Cardoso, Gema Jesus de Camargo, Luis Felipe Bachur, Christian Cruz Hofling, Rodrigo Angerami, Plínio Trabasso, Márcia Teixeira Garcia, Mariângela Ribeiro Resende |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#202
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,686
of 129,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.