↓ Skip to main content

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: comparison of mannitol and sodium phosphate. Results of a prospective randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: comparison of mannitol and sodium phosphate. Results of a prospective randomized study
Published in
Clinics, July 2000
DOI 10.1590/s0041-87811999000600004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelita Habr-Gama, Robert William de Azevedo Bringel, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Sergio Eduardo de Alonso Araújo, Afonso Henrique de Souza, João Elias Calache, Paulo Arruda Alves

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 66%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#326
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,112
of 39,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.