↓ Skip to main content

Familial hyperamylasemia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Familial hyperamylasemia
Published in
Clinics, October 2002
DOI 10.1590/s0041-87812002000200006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Kar Ling Koda, Eliana Vidolin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#1,001
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,651
of 50,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.