You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New percutaneous techniques for perforating the pulmonary valve in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, November 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0066-782x2001001100008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos A. C. Pedra, Luciano N. L. de Sousa, Simone R. F. F. Pedra, Waldinai P. Ferreira, Sérgio L. N. Braga, César A. Esteves, Maria Virgínia T. Santana, J. Eduardo Sousa, Valmir F. Fontes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#233
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,661
of 45,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.