↓ Skip to main content

Efeitos hemodinâmicos e vasculares do treinamento resistido: implicações na doença cardiovascular

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efeitos hemodinâmicos e vasculares do treinamento resistido: implicações na doença cardiovascular
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, October 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0066-782x2007001600008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Umpierre, Ricardo Stein

Abstract

Resistance training has been proposed as a possible strategy for cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation, and in this context, this review describes the cardiovascular effects mediated by this type of intervention. Increments in both muscular strength and capacity to perform daily tasks are well-characterized benefits of this type of training. More recently, studies using hemodynamic evaluation have shown cardiovascular stability in patients with coronary disease or heart failure during the performance of resistance exercise, with no apparent detriment to ventricular function or exacerbated increase in exercise blood pressure. Additionally, resting blood pressure also seems to be influenced by chronic resistance training, with a slight reduction in both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The measurement of pressure levels after a single resistance exercise session shows the occurrence of post-exercise hypotension in normal and hypertensive individuals; however, there is controversy as to the intensity of the effort necessary to induce this effect. Recently, intervention studies have investigated resistance exercise effects on vascular variables as arterial compliance and endothelial function. Despite the small number of experiments available, evidence has shown a potential influence of resistance training on the reduction of arterial compliance. On the other hand, peripheral blood flow is increased after resistance training, whereas the endothelial function seems to be improved especially after combined aerobic and resistance training. Additional research is necessary for an analysis of the efficacy of this intervention on validated outcomes, and for a greater understanding of the physiological mechanisms responsible for vascular adaptations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 26%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Professor 8 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 67 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 45 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 72 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#411
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,008
of 84,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.