You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Características ecocardiográficas da cardiomiopatia não-compactada: diagnóstico perdido ou errôneo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0066-782x2009000800024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Martínez-Baca López, Rosa Marisol Alonso Bravo, Domingo Arturo Rodríguez Huerta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 67% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Psychology | 1 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#233
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,920
of 122,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.