↓ Skip to main content

Further development of the baboon as a model for acute schistosomiasis

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Further development of the baboon as a model for acute schistosomiasis
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, June 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0074-02761992000800041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond T. Damian, Miguel A. de la Rosa, Daniel J. Murfin, Clarence A. Rawlings, Peter J. Weina, Yang Ping Xue

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#320
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,084
of 125,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#30
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.