↓ Skip to main content

A Critical Review on Chagas Disease Chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,502)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
663 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Critical Review on Chagas Disease Chemotherapy
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, April 2002
DOI 10.1590/s0074-02762002000100001
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Rodrigues Coura, Solange L de Castro

Abstract

In this "Critical Review" we made a historical introduction of drugs assayed against Chagas disease beginning in 1912 with the works of Mayer and Rocha Lima up to the experimental use of nitrofurazone. In the beginning of the 70s, nifurtimox and benznidazole were introduced for clinical treatment, but results showed a great variability and there is still a controversy about their use for chronic cases. After the introduction of these nitroheterocycles only a few compounds were assayed in chagasic patients. The great advances in vector control in the South Cone countries, and the demonstration of parasite in chronic patients indicated the urgency to discuss the etiologic treatment during this phase, reinforcing the need to find drugs with more efficacy and less toxicity. We also review potential targets in the parasite and present a survey about new classes of synthetic and natural compounds studied after 1992/1993, with which we intend to give to the reader a general view about experimental studies in the area of the chemotherapy of Chagas disease, complementing the previous papers of Brener (1979) and De Castro (1993).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 663 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 15 2%
United States 4 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 633 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 16%
Student > Master 94 14%
Student > Bachelor 88 13%
Researcher 77 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 68 10%
Other 108 16%
Unknown 123 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 23%
Chemistry 102 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 48 7%
Other 75 11%
Unknown 152 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,603,699
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#28
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,722
of 128,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.