↓ Skip to main content

Toxoplasma gondii: 1908-2008, homage to Nicolle, Manceaux and Splendore

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toxoplasma gondii: 1908-2008, homage to Nicolle, Manceaux and Splendore
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, May 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0074-02762009000200003
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J P Ferguson

Abstract

The discovery of Toxoplasma gondii independently by Nicolle and Manceaux (1908) and Splendore (1908) was to open a 'Pandora's Box' that has led research on this parasite into a number of scientific disciplines. In the 100 years since its discovery, the mystery surrounding T. gondii and its inter-relationship with humans has continued to provide a stimulating source of material in many areas of research, resulting in the publication of almost 20,000 papers and a number of books. This flood of diverse information shows no sign of abating, with an average of 10 papers per week appearing in PubMed. Herein, it is impossible to do more than provide a very superficial comment on what has become a massive body of scientific information. T. gondii has many unique features and seems to be the 'exception to almost every rule' thus acting as a focus for research in disciplines from epidemiology to immunology to human behaviour to cell biology to human disease. In this review a number of the historical advances will be mentioned and combined with a description of the basic biology of the parasite.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 274 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 56 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 28 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 9%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 64 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,138,373
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#68
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,616
of 103,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.