↓ Skip to main content

Educação interprofissional: formação de profissionais de saúde para o trabalho em equipe com foco nos usuários

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Educação interprofissional: formação de profissionais de saúde para o trabalho em equipe com foco nos usuários
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, August 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420130000400029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Peduzzi, Ian James Norman, Ana Claudia Camargo Gonçalves Germani, Jaqueline Alcântara Marcelino da Silva, Geisa Colebrusco de Souza

Abstract

The theoretical constructs of interprofessional education (IPE) are analyzed based on two reviews of the literature, taking the context of training for healthcare professionals in Brazil into consideration. Three types of training are identified: uniprofessional, multiprofessional and interprofessional, with predominance of the first type. The first occurs among students of the same profession, in isolation; the second occurs among students of two or more professions, in parallel without interaction; and the third involves shared learning, with interaction between students and/or professionals from different fields. The distinction between interprofessionalism and interdisciplinarity is highlighted: these refer to integration, respectively, of professional practices and disciplines or fields of knowledge. Through the analysis presented, it is concluded that in the Brazilian context, IPE (the basis for collaborative teamwork) is still limited to some recent initiatives, which deserve to be investigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 20 11%
Professor 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 69 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 72 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#176
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,295
of 210,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.