Title |
Human milk for neonatal pain relief during ophthalmoscopy*
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0080-623420130000500005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laiane Medeiros Ribeiro, Thaíla Corrêa Castral, Liciane Langona Montanholi, Mariana Firmino Daré, Aline Carolina de Araújo Silva, Sonir Roberto Rauber Antonini, Carmen Gracinda Silvan Scochi |
Abstract |
Ophthalmoscopy performed for the early diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is painful for preterm infants, thus necessitating interventions for minimizing pain. The present study aimed to establish the effectiveness of human milk, compared with sucrose, for pain relief in premature infants subjected to ophthalmoscopy for the early diagnosis of ROP. This investigation was a pilot, quasi-experimental study conducted with 14 premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a university hospital. Comparison between the groups did not yield a statistically significant difference relative to the crying time, salivary cortisol, or heart rate (HR). Human milk appears to be as effective as sucrose in relieving acute pain associated with ophthalmoscopy. The study's limitations included its small sample size and lack of randomization. Experimental investigations with greater sample power should be performed to reinforce the evidence found in the present study. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 12% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Researcher | 8 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 19% |
Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 26% |