You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dysfunctional psychological responses among Intensive Care Unit nurses: a systematic review of the literature *
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0080-623420150000500020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Karanikola, Margarita Giannakopoulou, Meropi Mpouzika, Charis P. Kaite, Georgios Z. Tsiaousis, Elizabeth D. E. Papathanassoglou |
| Abstract |
OBJECTIVETo systematically review evidence on dysfunctional psychological responses of Intensive Care Units nurses (ICUNs), with focus on anxiety and depressive symptoms and related factors.METHODA literature search was performed in CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus databases, from 1999 to present, along with a critical appraisal and synthesis of all relevant data. The following key words, separately and in combination, were used: "mental status" "depressive symptoms" "anxiety" "ICU nurses" "PTSD" "burnout" "compassion fatigue" "psychological distress".RESULTSThirteen quantitative studies in English and Greek were included. The results suggested increased psychological burden in ICUNs compared to other nursing specialties, as well as to the general population.CONCLUSIONSStudies investigating psychological responses of ICUNs are limited, internationally. Future longitudinal and intervention studies will contribute to a better understanding of the phenomenon. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 34% |
| Psychology | 26 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#296
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,676
of 286,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them