↓ Skip to main content

Humanização da assistência à saúde na percepção de enfermeiros e médicos de um hospital privado*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Humanização da assistência à saúde na percepção de enfermeiros e médicos de um hospital privado*
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420150000800006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita de Cássia Calegari, Maria Cristina Komatsu Braga Massarollo, Marcelo José dos Santos

Abstract

Objective Exploratory, descriptive, qualitative study aimed at checking the meaning of the term humanization for nurses and physicians at a private hospital in the city of São Paulo and identify factors that hinder and facilitate humanization in care. Method Exploratory, descriptive, and qualitative study conducted with 19 health care professionals. After data collection, the reports were categorized according to the method proposed by Bardin and analyzed within the theoretical framework of humanization. Results Humanization is related to respect, caring, and empathy. In professional practice, the actions aimed at humanization can be facilitated by organizational culture, but hampered by overwork. Conclusion It is necessary to adopt management policies and actions that provide professionals to meet the expectations of patients and their families in search of humanized care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 22 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,915,133
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#146
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,385
of 361,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.