You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perennial grasses for recovery of the aggregation capacity of a reconstructed soil in a coal mining area in southern Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-06832014000100033 |
Authors |
Lizete Stumpf, Eloy Antonio Pauletto, Flavia Fontana Fernandes, Luis Eduardo Akiyoshi Sanches Suzuki, Tiago Stumpf da Silva, Luiz Fernando Spinelli Pinto, Claudia Liane Rodrigues de Lima |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#42
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,779
of 239,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them