You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spittlebug Cephisus siccifolius damaging eucalypt plants in the State of Bahia, Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, September 2005
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-204x2005000700015 |
Authors |
Genésio Tâmara Ribeiro, Marcelo da Costa Mendonça, João Basílio de Mesquita, José Cola Zanuncio, Gervásio Silva Carvalho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 83% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,186,446
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
#37
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,622
of 69,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them