You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Duplicação da hipófise e da haste hipofisária: relato de um caso e revisão da literatura
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiologia Brasileira, June 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-39842001000300011 |
| Authors |
Claudia da Costa Leite, Maria Teresa Carvalho de Lacerda, Maria Olívia Rodrigues da Costa, Edson Amaro Júnior, Alessandra Sato, Vanessa Quintas Passos, Maria Adelaide Albergaria Pereira, Luciani Renata Silveira de Carvalho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 57% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#52
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,545
of 52,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them