↓ Skip to main content

Papel da ultra-sonografia na avaliação da efusão pleural

Overview of attention for article published in Radiologia Brasileira, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 394)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Papel da ultra-sonografia na avaliação da efusão pleural
Published in
Radiologia Brasileira, May 2006
DOI 10.1590/s0100-39842006000200014
Authors

Adilson Cunha Ferreira, Francisco Mauad Filho, Tatiana Braga, Glenda Downing Fanstone, Ivan Charbel Bumlai Chodraui, Nilton Onari

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#28
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,356
of 86,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them